Whose World is This Wednesdays: One-on-One Action!

I’ve been hearing about this a lot lately.  Everyone is trying to make theater more intimate. And I’m not talking an assembly of people in a dark room, voyeuristically watching some MFA student pontificate existentialism or naked men f&@*ing.

I’m talking about one-on-one action as shown here , here and there’s even a festival about it here. That’s right Circuiteers, the latest craze in keeping butts in the seat is creating a one-on-one theatrical experience.  It’s like the art of Marina Abramović who believes that theater is a fraud and since it’s not real, without real emotions from a realistic situation then why are we “making it?”

When I think of theater, I think of it in terms of entertainment-the edification of the Greek god Dionysus.  So how do I feel about this new phenomenon? I think it’s down right gimmicky. Would I want a guy washing my feet dressed in a loin cloth? Not unless that guy is my man and there’s some suckin’ going on afterwards!  *wink*

Theater’s survival is based on numbers.  It’s show BUSINESS.  Having a production with one person is not only expensive-it’s wasteful.

I’m all about having the audience experience theater in its most intimate of forms but the description of some of these experiences are more based on ones subconscious need to be touched and attended too-it’s more catering towards a patrons sensuality than theatrical intimacy.

Lyn Gardner of the Guardian UK suggests the exclusivity of being the “only” one able to experience the show is attractive which is why people participate.  How entertaining can it be to sleep next to a perfect stranger or become uninhibited with someone you don’t know?  Who’s the artist and who’s the audience?  This is like a bad Kinsey experiment.

Apparently this has been going on since 2005.  I guess I just never noticed it before.  This hasn’t hit the-ever-slow-to catch-on trends in Chicago yet.  I’m sure when it does-it will ignite like Smokey the Bear’s forest!

But I ask, when did we stop being theater practitioners and start being therapist?  Art is beyond subjective, I don’t know if theater can survive in this genre.  One-on-one performances are cute but in the end, they can’t survive.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Add yours →

  1. Just checked out the links in your note and I embrace the idea. Though it may not survive at least it lived. Cool Concept, I’d consider doing my play in this manner. However, I have perform it for 1 person before though not in a box or for… an elitist LOL! I see them as private readings a way to get the work out and hone my skill as a storyteller and learn what makes them tick during my show and what is not working. It’s been a wonderful opportunity to develop my work 🙂

    • Thanks Anita for posting! Thanks for commenting, the only problem I have with it is the exclusivity of the idea. If we dispel the notion that theater is an elitist genre of art or this concept of “high art” leaves people who don’t have the money out of the loop then this 1-to-1 performance doesn’t work. It pushes the possibility of more people experiencing the art further away.

      THANK YOU so much for commenting!! I write these blogs and I sometimes wonder if people actually read them. And if they do read them, I hope they would comment! Thanks again!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: